| A lot of people – myself included – spend a lot of time analyzing   various stock market sectors looking for the next “big mover.”  A great   deal of research seems to back up the theory that if you “get the sector   right” you can do very well in the stock market.  This is because   fundamental changes in a given industry tend to take a long time to play   out.  For example, if the Fed cuts interest rates it is not like bank   stocks triple overnight.  It takes awhile for the “cause” to “effect”   changes in the fundamentals for individual companies.  So if you can   spot a trend in an industry group or sector you can often ride it for   awhile.  Still, it appears that some of this effort may not be   necessary.   More on that thought in a moment. One key sector that gets a lot of attention is the “financial”   sector.  Most of us well remember 2008 when the financial sector almost   ceased to be the financial sector anymore.  Analysts spend a lot of time   analyzing the factors that affect these important companies and the   likely impact for their stocks.  Here’s a tip guys – I think you might   be over thinking it a bit.  And I have a good objective perspective on   this because Lord knows I’ve ever been accused of over thinking   anything. Financials by the Day of Month OK, here I go again with the “seasonal stuff.”  Hey, it’s what I do   OK.  For our “proxy” we will use Fidelity Select Financials sector fund   (ticker FIDSX).  Let’s assume that we hold this fund only six trading   days per month: -The last four days of each month -The first two days of the next month So we are talking about buying and holding during a contiguous six   day period starting at the close on the fifth to last trading day of   each month and lasting through the close of the second trading day of   the second month and then switching to cash until the next six day   period comes around.  Heretofore we will refer to the favorable six days of the month   period as “The System” (catchy, huh?) and the rest of the time as “Non   System Days.” So is this a viable strategy?  As a writer I would just as soon   describe it all in 1,000 eloquent words.  However, in order to adhere to   the norms of decent society I will simply use a picture instead.    Figure 1 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in FIDSX both during the   6 day period each month and excluding the six day period each month,   since September 30, 1988.  The results are “interesting.” 
 click to enlarge
 Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 invested in FIDSX using The System (blue   line) versus growth of $1,000 invested in FIDSX during all Non System   Days (red line); 9/30/88-Present For the record, since 9/30/1988: -$1,000 invested in FIDSX only during the six-day seasonally favorable period each month grew to $24,088, or +2,309%. -$1,000 invested in FIDSX only during all other trading days shrank to $374, or -63%. Anyone notice a difference? Looking at Rolling 5-Year Periods Now let’s compare the five year rolling rate of return for The System   versus Non System Days.  Figure 2 displays the following calculation: -Each day the five year return for The System is subtracted from the five year return for Non System Days.  A positive number means the System outperformed over the previous   five years and a negative number means The System underperformed over   the previous five years. 
 click to enlarge
 Figure 2 – 5-Year % return for The System minus 5-Year % return for Non System Days (1993-Present) As you can see in Figure 2, except for a period of time during the   1990’s and the Great Bull Market of those years, The System has   routinely outperformed non System Days.  In fact, The System   outperformed Non System Days 85% of the time on a rolling five year   basis. 2007 to Present The growth of equity for Non System Days peaked in May of 2007.    Since that time the difference in the performance of System versus Non   System days has only grown wider.  The growth of $1,000 invested in   FIDSX using The System versus Non System Days since May 2007 appears in   Figure 3.   
 click to enlarge
 Figure 3 – Growth of $1,000 invested in FIDSX using The System (blue   line) versus growth of $1,000 invested in FIDSX during all non System   Days (5/22/2007-Present) For the record, since 5/22/2007: -$1,000 invested in FIDSX only during the six-day seasonally favorable period each month gained +83%. -$1,000 invested in FIDSX only during all other trading days lost -73%. Actually Using this Knowledge Ironically the one thing you cannot do is use FIDSX to emulate this   strategy.  This is because Fidelity imposes some fairly strict switching   restrictions.  However, in its place investors can either use the ETF   ticker XLF or Profunds ticker FNPIX or Rydex ticker RYFIX.   Summary So are financial stocks destined to rise every month during our   “mystical” seasonally favorable period?  If only.  Will The System   continue to outperform Non System Days ad infinitum into the future?  It   beats me.  Nevertheless, are the differences in performance fairly   compelling? I’ll let you draw your own conclusions. Jay Kaeppel – Optionetics |